0

The COVID-19 “Test”: Just Say No

PCR has been the most commonly used testing tool for determining if one is a carrier of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and the increasing number of positive COVID-19 cases based on this test have served as the primary criteria for the state’s ongoing unconstitutional actions taken to combat the pandemic. As you might recall, back in March “lockdowns” and other mandates were supposed to be short term measures to be lifted once we had “flattened the curve” in regards to the number of hospital admissions and COVID-19 deaths. Well, the COVID-19 curve was not only flattened but virtually eviscerated as mortality numbers have dropped and then flatlined since late Spring of 2020 while hospitals worldwide have mostly sat empty1. What hasn’t been flattened is the COVID-19 case count, which has steadily increased over the summer and fall up to the present day.

This case vs mortality ratio is perhaps the most misunderstood and criminally under-reported phenomena of the whole COVID-19 narrative. The concept is really quite simple – the fact that COVID-19 case counts are rising while the COVID-19 mortality rate has flat-lined can be explained in a couple of ways:

  • Herd immunity.
  • Faulty testing.

Assuming the virus is real2 and can actually cause disease, then herd immunity is the most likely explanation for the decrease in COVID-19 mortality rates. This implies our immune systems have fought it off, which just happens to be the primary means by which humans have protected themselves from disease since the dawn of time. Of course the mainstream seldom if ever mentions that we might want to simply rely on our natural defenses to survive this allegedly deadly pandemic. It isn’t hard to see why; autonomous individuals are enemies of the state.

But a faulty COVID-19 testing procedure is particularly interesting because inaccurate or fraudulent case counts turns the whole pandemic narrative on its head. PCR stands for “polymerase chain reaction” and is a method for replicating a sample of genetic (DNA,RNA) material billions or even trillions of times by the use of “cyclical amplification”. This is a complex topic and we don’t pretend to be experts in this area, but regardless what is clear is that PCR was not designed as a mechanism for detecting disease – the very inventor of PCR has publicly stated this:


“PCR is just a process that allows you to make a whole lot of something out of something. It doesn’t tell you that you are sick, or that the thing that you ended up with was going to hurt you or anything like that.”

Kary Mullis – Nobel Prize Winner and Inventor of PCR


PCR only assists in identifying a given genetic fragment, it does not measure active “viral load” and thus does not indicate whether one actually has the disease. Further, it does not distinguish between live and dead virus genetic material. This means one could test positive for COVID-19 based on the detection of genetic fragments from a long dead virus that may have been in one’s system for many years. On top of all this, the CDC along with numerous independent researchers have concluded that the higher number of amplification cycles applied to a genetic sample can actually reduce the accuracy of the overall results. Multiple sources have confirmed that anything above 35 amplification cycles can result in a COVID-19 false positive rate of over 90%, which effectively renders the results of the PCR test meaningless. Meanwhile, the FDA has directed testing laboratories to apply amplification of 40 cycles or more. Even the New York Times admits that the COVID-19 PCR test is highly inaccurate:


“This number of amplification cycles needed to find the virus, called the cycle threshold, is never included in the results sent to doctors and coronavirus patients, although it could tell them how infectious the patients are. In three sets of testing data that include cycle thresholds, compiled by officials in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada, up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus, a review by The Times found.”

New York Times: Your Coronavirus Test Is Positive. Maybe It Shouldn’t Be.


In the following video we also find Dr. Fauci admitting that amplification of a genetic sample above a 35 cycle threshold renders the PCR test meaningless (12m 51s):

Jon Rappaport3 expands further on this topic:


Smoking gun: Fauci states COVID test has fatal flaw; confession from the “beloved” expert of experts


Del Bigtree also exposes the PCR fraud (10m 34s):


Below are some links to additional information, insights, and opinions about PCR testing which we highly suggest you read4:

Since COVID-19 case counts form the entire basis for the state’s draconian response to combating the pandemic, the ramifications of a wholly unreliable COVID-19 testing procedure cannot be overstated. Besides generating needless fear and angst in the general public, those receiving a false positive result are now officially and erroneously recorded as a bio-hazard threat to the community, subject to mandatory quarantine and other violations of their civil liberties and right to privacy. Additionally, anyone that may have come in contact with an allegedly infected person is now at risk of being caught up in the contact tracing dragnet that is then initiated as authorities seek to “control the spread” of the phantom virus. The sad fact is that once you are in the system they can can then track, trace, harass, haunt, and stalk you for the rest of your life.

So, considering all that we’ve just covered, needless to say there is absolutely no rational reason to ever take a COVID-19 test.

The COVID-19 puzzle pieces continue falling into place, and the picture they are producing is starting to deviate markedly from the one painted by our governors and their agents in the media. The crime here is becoming more clear – the false positive results that the PCR “test” generates are being used to justify the construction of the COVID-19 prison planet we are all now living in.


  1. Yes, it’s true – we’ll likely dive into this topic in later posts []
  2. Germ theory versus terrain theory – a topic for another post []
  3. If you would like a more comprehensive understanding of virology and how it has been exploited by both the state and the medical industrial complex for generations now, we highly recommend most all of the COVID-19 and related information Rappaport publishes on his blog – blog.nomorefakenews.com []
  4. The truth is learned, not told, right? []

Tom Hanx

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.